The Image X Removed: A Child-Sized Dental Chair on Epstein Island by Kevin Wikse
A post I published on X containing a factual image of a child-sized dental chair photographed on Jeffrey Epstein’s private island was removed by the platform.
The image itself is documented. The chair exists. The photograph exists.
Discussion of additional items visible in the same environment—including masks—will be addressed in a separate post.
Readers familiar with my work on MissingRVP know that I have long maintained, based on sustained investigation, that the most severe abuses associated with Epstein’s network did not occur exclusively on Epstein Island itself, but on a secondary location commonly referred to as Dog Island.
I previously published a detailed blog post outlining evidence, testimony patterns, and logistical anomalies connected to Dog Island, including references to what appeared to be a covert maritime access point consistent with a submarine dock. That post later disappeared without explanation.
Subsequent to that publication, it became publicly known that Ghislaine Maxwell’s family held ownership interests in a private submarine-related enterprise—a fact that, at minimum, warrants serious scrutiny when considered alongside prior reporting and unresolved questions about transportation methods within Epstein’s operational network.
My investigations into the Epstein case—conducted through conventional journalistic research as well as structured psychic and remote-viewing methodologies I have publicly documented for years—have repeatedly produced results later corroborated by emerging facts. This track record is public, time-stamped, and verifiable.
For that reason, the removal of my post did not surprise me.
What did surprise me was the speed.
The post was removed almost immediately after publication.
This raises legitimate concerns about the extent to which so-called “free speech” platforms selectively suppress specific categories of evidence-based discussion—particularly when the material intersects with high-profile criminal cases, unresolved abuse allegations, and powerful institutional interests.
I therefore restate the question here, in a forum beyond the reach of silent deletion:
Why does a child-sized dental chair appear in documented photographs taken inside a property owned by Jeffrey Epstein?
The presence of such an object in that context is not benign.
Its function is not ambiguous.
And its implications are deeply disturbing.
Certain dental procedures can prevent biting or resistance. That fact is medically recognized. The relevance of such equipment, when scaled for a child and placed within this environment, is a matter that deserves investigation—not erasure.
Or in more frankly and plainly spoken words:
THEY PULLED OUT THE CHILD'S TEETH SO THEY WOULDN'T GET THEIR DICKS BITTEN OFF.
Oh, and X, FUCK YOU!
The public is entitled to ask these questions.
Journalists are entitled to publish documented images.
And censorship, especially when instantaneous, invites far more scrutiny than silence ever could.)
Platforms do not erase content this fast unless it touches something real.
Not rumors. Not fiction.
Records. Photographs. Patterns.
History does not forget what corruption tries to delete—it simply waits for someone stubborn enough to archive it properly.
I am that someone.
— Kevin Wikse
MissingRVP
About the Author
Kevin Wikse is an investigative writer, remote viewer, and occult researcher specializing in suppressed history, systemic corruption, and high-strangeness phenomena. His work examines the convergence of government power, clandestine programs, ritual and symbolic systems, and human cost, with focused analysis on the Arkansas Prison Blood Scandal, Factor VIII contamination, human trafficking networks, classified black projects, institutional secrecy, and the persistent patterns of silence surrounding historical abuses of power.
“I don’t dig up stories. I’m a fucking necromancer with a press pass. I resurrect what power tried to kill.”
— Kevin Wikse


Comments
Post a Comment